Talk:Aircraft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
(→Soviets: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* I have a question for other users: Should we add an "Era" sub-heading or do you think that would be overkill? It might be overkill, but it would also be educational and potentially useful. [[User:Markc|Markc]] 02:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC) | * I have a question for other users: Should we add an "Era" sub-heading or do you think that would be overkill? It might be overkill, but it would also be educational and potentially useful. [[User:Markc|Markc]] 02:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Soviets == | |||
Soviet military planes were mostly called by bureau abbreviation and index, Tu-95, MiG-29, Su-27, etc. There ''were'' few nick-names, but that's rather internal knowledge, plus actually in Russian. One might take NATO reporting names, as they have some logic (f- for fighter, b- for bomber, one syllable for prop, two syllable for jet, etc.), but is this true Soviet? Modern-day projects have some fancy names after American counterpart, but they are scarce and mostly lame. | |||
Revision as of 20:47, 18 August 2018
Please write here if you have questions, comments, or complaints. And please help add aircraft to the page! Markc 02:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have a question for other users: Should we add an "Era" sub-heading or do you think that would be overkill? It might be overkill, but it would also be educational and potentially useful. Markc 02:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Soviets
Soviet military planes were mostly called by bureau abbreviation and index, Tu-95, MiG-29, Su-27, etc. There were few nick-names, but that's rather internal knowledge, plus actually in Russian. One might take NATO reporting names, as they have some logic (f- for fighter, b- for bomber, one syllable for prop, two syllable for jet, etc.), but is this true Soviet? Modern-day projects have some fancy names after American counterpart, but they are scarce and mostly lame.