Talk:Aircraft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '''Please write here if you have questions, comments, or complaints. And please help add aircraft to the page!'' ~~~~') |
(Add a sub-category) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Please write here if you have questions, comments, or complaints. And please help add aircraft to the page!'' [[User:Markc|Markc]] 02:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC) | ''Please write here if you have questions, comments, or complaints. And please help add aircraft to the page!'' [[User:Markc|Markc]] 02:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
* I have a question for other users: Should we add an "Era" sub-heading or do you think that would be overkill? It might be overkill, but it would also be educational and potentially useful. [[User:Markc|Markc]] 02:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Soviets == | |||
Soviet military planes were mostly called by bureau abbreviation and index, Tu-95, MiG-29, Su-27, etc. There ''were'' few nick-names, but that's rather internal knowledge, plus actually in Russian. One might take NATO reporting names, as they have some logic (f- for fighter, b- for bomber, one syllable for prop, two syllable for jet, etc.), but is this true Soviet? Modern-day projects have some fancy names after American counterpart, but they are scarce and mostly lame. | |||
== Civilian Aircraft == | |||
A more peaceful naming scheme will limit reputation risk if your computers hit national news. | |||
Latest revision as of 11:31, 18 October 2018
Please write here if you have questions, comments, or complaints. And please help add aircraft to the page! Markc 02:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- I have a question for other users: Should we add an "Era" sub-heading or do you think that would be overkill? It might be overkill, but it would also be educational and potentially useful. Markc 02:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Soviets[edit source]
Soviet military planes were mostly called by bureau abbreviation and index, Tu-95, MiG-29, Su-27, etc. There were few nick-names, but that's rather internal knowledge, plus actually in Russian. One might take NATO reporting names, as they have some logic (f- for fighter, b- for bomber, one syllable for prop, two syllable for jet, etc.), but is this true Soviet? Modern-day projects have some fancy names after American counterpart, but they are scarce and mostly lame.
Civilian Aircraft[edit source]
A more peaceful naming scheme will limit reputation risk if your computers hit national news.