Talk:Muppets: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with 'This list includes Sesame Street characters, which does not make it stricly a list of "Muppets". Perhaps the Sesame St. characters should be on another list, or under another sub…') |
m (Reverted edits by 162.251.6.11 (talk) to last revision by Markc) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This list includes Sesame Street characters, which does not make it stricly a list of "Muppets". Perhaps the Sesame St. characters should be on another list, or under another sub-heading at the very least. (I wonder why this page was deleted.) [[User:Markc|Markc]] 16:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC) | This list includes Sesame Street characters, which does not make it stricly a list of "Muppets". Perhaps the Sesame St. characters should be on another list, or under another sub-heading at the very least. (I wonder why this page was deleted.) [[User:Markc|Markc]] 16:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
* Yeah, I can see what you mean, in fact it looked like there were far more characters there that were "not" muppet characters, so have replaced them with the recurring muppets from the conveniently provided link.(not sure what you meant about the deleted page, I couldn't find a deleted page refering to muppets, though I didn't look back further than a couple years) --[[User:Dazzam|Dazzam]] 00:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
** Thanks! By the deleted page, I meant the discussion page had been deleted (there was a notice). [[User:Markc|Markc]] 08:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
*** Ah, yes. found it. Back in 2005 Drue discovered that he was having problems with spam links. There were a 'lot' of Talk: pages that he had to delete to clean that up. There was no other information on the page(and probably on most of the others too). btw: I noticed in 'Aircraft' there's not really much content. It may be better to add the content, and then, if there is enough content, separate it into categories. [[User:Dazzam|Dazzam]] 22:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
**** Oh, Dazzam, there is enough content. It will just take time to put it in. [[User:Markc|Markc]] 03:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:21, 30 July 2016
This list includes Sesame Street characters, which does not make it stricly a list of "Muppets". Perhaps the Sesame St. characters should be on another list, or under another sub-heading at the very least. (I wonder why this page was deleted.) Markc 16:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I can see what you mean, in fact it looked like there were far more characters there that were "not" muppet characters, so have replaced them with the recurring muppets from the conveniently provided link.(not sure what you meant about the deleted page, I couldn't find a deleted page refering to muppets, though I didn't look back further than a couple years) --Dazzam 00:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! By the deleted page, I meant the discussion page had been deleted (there was a notice). Markc 08:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. found it. Back in 2005 Drue discovered that he was having problems with spam links. There were a 'lot' of Talk: pages that he had to delete to clean that up. There was no other information on the page(and probably on most of the others too). btw: I noticed in 'Aircraft' there's not really much content. It may be better to add the content, and then, if there is enough content, separate it into categories. Dazzam 22:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, Dazzam, there is enough content. It will just take time to put it in. Markc 03:02, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. found it. Back in 2005 Drue discovered that he was having problems with spam links. There were a 'lot' of Talk: pages that he had to delete to clean that up. There was no other information on the page(and probably on most of the others too). btw: I noticed in 'Aircraft' there's not really much content. It may be better to add the content, and then, if there is enough content, separate it into categories. Dazzam 22:27, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! By the deleted page, I meant the discussion page had been deleted (there was a notice). Markc 08:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC)